On Sunday, Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law a bill that prohibits cities and counties from banning male circumcision. AB 768 was among 44 measures Brown approved; he vetoed four.
AB 768 was introduced in February by Assembly members Mike Gatto (D-Burbank) and Fiona Ma (D-San Francisco) to head off a San Francisco ballot initiative seeking to ban the procedure. In July, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi blocked that proposed measure. According to Giorgi, it violated an existing statute that forbids local governments from regulating medical procedures and flouted federal protection of religious freedom. AB 768 continued to progress through the Legislature even after the ruling.
Opponents of male circumcision argue the practice can have negative mental and sexual health consequences. But medical experts point to its benefits, including a lower risk for female-to-male HIV transmission and cancer. Further, male circumcision is a sacred rite for Jews and Muslims, who lobbied heavily against the ballot initiative.
Gatto argued the ballot measure would strip Californians of "an expression of personal, medical, and religious freedom."
Back to other news for October 2011
This article was provided by CDC National Prevention Information Network. It is a part of the publication CDC HIV/Hepatitis/STD/TB Prevention News Update.
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy