August 19, 2011
| ADAPs With Waiting Lists (9,201 Individuals in 12 States*, as of August 18, 2011) | ||||
| State | Number of Individuals on ADAP Waiting List | Percent of the Total ADAP Waiting List | Increase/Decrease From Previous Reporting Period | Date Waiting List Began |
| Alabama | 164 | 2% | +15 | May 2011 |
| Arkansas | 51 | 0.6% | +0 | December 2010 |
| Florida | 3,861 | 42% | +69 | June 2010 |
| Georgia | 1,724 | 19% | -48 | July 2010 |
| Idaho | 26 | 0.3% | +1 | February 2011 |
| Louisiana** | 1,012 | 11% | +25 | June 2010 |
| Montana | 29 | 0.3% | +0 | January 2008 |
| North Carolina | 327 | 5% | +9 | January 2010 |
| Ohio | 126 | 1% | -135 | July 2010 |
| South Carolina | 941 | 10% | +36 | March 2010 |
| Utah | 42 | 0.5% | +1 | May 2011 |
| Virginia | 898 | 10% | +11 | November 2010 |
|
* As a result of FY2010 ADAP emergency funding, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Utah eliminated their waiting lists; Idaho reinstituted a waiting list in February 2011 and Utah reinstituted a waiting list in May 2011. ** Louisiana has a capped enrollment on their program. This number represents their current unmet need. | ||||
| ADAPs With Other Cost-Containment Strategies: Financial Eligibility (445 Individuals in 6 States, as of August 3, 2011) | ||||
| State | Lowered Financial Eligibility | Disenrolled Clients | ||
| Arkansas | 500% to 200% FPL | 99 clients (September 2009) | ||
| Illinois | 500% to 300% FPL | Grandfathered in current clients from 301-500% FPL | ||
| North Dakota | 400% to 300% FPL | Grandfathered in current clients from 301-400% FPL | ||
| Ohio | 500% to 300% FPL | 257 clients (July 2010) | ||
| South Carolina | 550% to 300% FPL | Grandfathered in current clients from 301-550% FPL | ||
| Utah | 400% to 250% FPL | 89 clients (September 2009) | ||
Alabama: reduced formulary
Arizona: reduced formulary
Arkansas: reduced formulary
Colorado: reduced formulary
Florida: reduced formulary, transitioned 5,403 clients to Welvista from February 15 to March 31, 2011
Georgia: reduced formulary, implemented medical criteria, participating in the Alternative Method Demonstration Project
Idaho: capped enrollment
Illinois: reduced formulary, instituted monthly expenditure cap ($2,000 per client per month), disenrolled clients not accessing ADAP for 90 days
Kentucky: reduced formulary
Louisiana: discontinued reimbursement of laboratory assays
North Carolina: reduced formulary
North Dakota: capped enrollment, instituted annual expenditure cap
Ohio: reduced formulary
Puerto Rico: reduced formulary
Utah: reduced formulary
Virginia: reduced formulary, restricted eligibility criteria, transitioned 204 clients onto waiting list
Washington: instituted client cost sharing, reduced formulary, only paying insurance premiums for clients currently on antiretrovirals
Wyoming: capped enrollment, reduced formulary, instituted client cost sharing
Alaska: reduce formulary
Florida: lower financial eligibility
Hawaii: establish waiting list
Kentucky: reduce formulary
Montana: reduce formulary
Oregon: reduce formulary
Puerto Rico: reduce formulary
Tennessee: establish waiting list
Washington: establish waiting list
Wyoming: establish waiting list, lower financial eligibility
*** March 31, 2012 is the end of ADAP FY2011. ADAP fiscal years begin April 1 and ends March 31.