New Drug Adds to Arsenal Against AIDS
July 25, 2011
The new HIV drug rilpivirine is safe and effective and has fewer side effects than efavirenz when used in combination therapy, two recent studies found.
In the first study, initial response rates (viral load under 50 copies/mL, defined by intention-to-treat time to loss-of-virological-response algorithm [ITT-TLOVR]) were 86 percent for rilpivirine-based therapy and 82 percent for efavirenz-based therapy, and CD4 cell count increases were similar between the groups. Incidence of virological failure was slightly higher in the rilpivirine than efavirenz group (7 percent vs. 5 percent), though fewer discontinued treatment on rilpivirine than efavirenz due to adverse events (4 percent vs. 7 percent). Grade 2-4 treatment-related adverse events were less common with rilpivirine than efavirenz (16 percent vs. 31 percent), and lipid increases were significantly lower on rilpivirine than efavirenz (p
At 48 weeks, rilpivirine proved non-inferior in efficacy to efavirenz using a 12 percent margin on logistic regression analysis, the study found.
In the second study comparing rilpivirine-based with efavirenz-based therapy, response rates (less than 50 copies/mL ITT-TLOVR) were 83 percent for both confirmed at 48 weeks. Rilpivirine proved non-inferior in efficacy compared with efavirenz (also 12 percent margin), though incidence of virological failure was higher for rilpivirine (13 percent vs. 6 percent; 11 percent vs. 4 percent ITT-TLOVR). Grade 2-4 adverse events and discontinuations due to AEs were less common for rilpivirine than efavirenz (Grade 2-4: 16 percent vs. 31 percent; discontinuations: 2 percent vs. 8 percent).
Rilpivirine had a more favorable safety and tolerability profile than efavirenz, though a higher virological failure rate, and was non-inferior in efficacy, the study authors concluded.
The studies, "Rilpivirine Versus Efavirenz With Two Background Nucleoside or Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Treatment-Naive Adults Infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): A Phase 3, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial" and "Rilpivirine Versus Efavirenz with Tenofovir and Emtricitabine in Treatment-Naive Adults Infected With HIV-1 (ECHO): A Phase 3 Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Trial," were published in Lancet (2011;378(9787):229-237 and 238-246, respectively).
Agence France Presse
Studies on Pipeline ARVs: Quad, Elvitegravir/Cobicistat, Cobicistat, GSK1265744, BMS986001 Dolutegravir, GSK-1265744, Long-Acting Formulations (Monthly Injections): Rilpivirine-LA, Raltegravir and Patient Views
This article was provided by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is a part of the publication CDC HIV/Hepatitis/STD/TB Prevention News Update. Visit the CDC's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)