I'm angry? You just let loose a whole lot of venom. My point was that if the courts are going to go after people with HIV, then they damn well should go after other people with other diseases that are MORE deadly also.
Since you disagree with that I guess you also are saying that it's always the pozzie's responsiblity to protect the status of a negative partner and that the neggies don't have to take responsibility for their own health or actions? I don't happen to agree with that either.
Like I said. I personally think not disclosing is wrong, but until this country starts realizing that it takes two to tango people with HIV will always be on the losing end. Cases like this just point out that inequity.
I am well aware that not knowing is a defense. That wasn't my point. My point was it is because people don't always know their status that people that THINK they are HIV- should always assume their partner is HIV+ until proven otherwise and TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR OWN HEALTH.
If you want to serosort that's up to you. If you want signed, notarized agreements, that's your call. If you want to look down your nose at people that 'have sex with impunity', your choice.
Oh, and I don't feel like a leper. Sorry you do, it seems to be taking quite a toll on you. I guess feeling like an outcast would cause someone to be angry. Try letting some of that anger go, maybe you'll feel better about your life.
So FLA....sorry to hear how you feel about this. Thought you were handling your postive status better. Didn't know you felt as angry and considered yourself to be cursed by God for sin, as this new poster, whom by the way has only posted one thing. This article which he/she spammed across the boards.
Just saying....
Post Extras:
|
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
Threaded
Re: interesting news story of man with HIV?
Reply
Quote
