Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol

HIV Transmission and Education >> Am I Infected?

anonymouslad
New User

Reged: 11/22/04
Posts: 12
testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposure?
      04/23/08 02:18 AM

Why do the experts(on this site anyway) suggest that testing for HIV is not even recommended if unprotected oral sex is the person's only possible risk? Yet there IS still a chance that HIV can be contracted this way? Surely it would be (a little) better medically if the person discovered they are HIV+ early rather than much later?

So why then do the experts say that testing is not needed if oral is their only possible exposure?

Post Extras: Remind Me!     Notify Moderator

Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposure? anonymouslad 04/23/08 02:18 AM
. * Re: testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposure? vasco   04/23/08 04:47 PM
. * Re: testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposur Robertguy   04/23/08 04:02 PM
. * Re: testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposure? ravi   04/23/08 11:31 AM
. * Re: testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposure? anonymouslad   04/24/08 02:00 PM
. * Re: testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposur Jackie__Blue   04/23/08 08:12 AM
. * Re: testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposur Robertguy   04/23/08 04:24 PM
. * Re: testing NOT needed if oral sex is only exposur Jackie__Blue   04/23/08 05:38 PM

What's New at TheBody.com

Additional Information
0 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  TheBody, bogart, crabman, riverprincess 



Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is enabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Thread views: 9313

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy Statement The Body

*
UBB.threads™ 6.2.3