|
|
Cocktail Daze
#14353 - 12/30/00 07:52 PM
|
Reply
|
Quote
|
|
|
With the new guidlines coming into effect in Jan what will doctors tell their patients who are now taking the cocktail. "Oh I'm sorry you did not need to take it after all" or " I guess I don't really know what I'm doing please don't sue me." One day this posion will be seen as the greatest medical fraud/ murder in human history. Until then be wise and learn all you can before you experiment with your body. Hope 4 the new year! Peace
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
AIDS Treatment News Issue #354 November 3, 2000 phone 800-TREAT-1-2, or 415-255-0588
Has Anti-HIV Treatment Cut AIDS Deaths?
Since 1995 the number of deaths from AIDS in the United States has dropped from nearly 50,000 per year to less than 17,000. Deaths have dropped in Europe and Canada too. Doctors and scientists believe that fewer people are dying because many have been helped by new treatments which work against HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.
But some people claim that HIV doesn't really cause AIDS. These people, called "AIDS deniers," "denialists" or "AIDS dissidents," say the new drugs haven't reduced AIDS deaths. Some even claim that the medicines actually make people get sick and die.
How Do We Know That the Drugs Used to Treat AIDS Work?
How were the "drug cocktails" developed?
When the AIDS epidemic began in 1981, there were no drugs to fight HIV. When the first drugs became available in the late 1980s, patients generally used only one of them at a time. But in December, 1995, the first of a new kind of anti-HIV drug, called protease inhibitors, was approved. Scientists discovered that they worked best when used together with at least two of the older drugs. These combinations are known as "cocktails" or "HAART," which stands for "Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy." Doctors saw many of their sickest patients get better when they started HAART.
When did AIDS deaths start to drop?
Some AIDS deniers say that AIDS deaths were dropping before HAART became available, so the drugs couldn't be the cause. That is not true. The most AIDS deaths ever in the United States happened in 1995, when almost 50,000 people died of AIDS. The first protease inhibitor was approved for sale that December, and soon HAART began to be used widely. In 1996 the number of deaths dropped below 37,000.
After rising every year since 1981, 1996 was the first year that AIDS deaths ever dropped. The number of deaths dropped again in 1997 and 1998.
Did other things affect AIDS death rates?
Yes, the rise in AIDS deaths began to slow down in the early 1990s for two reasons: First, as we learned more about AIDS in the early 1980s, many people began using condoms or having fewer sexual partners. The spread of HIV slowed, but because HIV takes about 10 years to cause AIDS, it took until the 1990s for safer sex to slow the rise in AIDS cases and deaths.
Second, doctors learned more about how to treat AIDS. Even before HAART, doctors were learning to combine anti-HIV drugs and got better at preventing or treating many of the infections that kill people with AIDS.
These better treatments were already starting to slow down the increase in AIDS deaths. But HAART dramatically added to that improvement.
How do scientists decide if medicines work?
Scientists study new medicines in what are called clinical trials: One group of patients takes only their regular medicines, while the other group takes the new drug being tested. Then the groups are compared to see who does better. These trials showed that patients on HAART stay healthier and live longer than those taking just one or two anti-HIV drugs.
What other ways do scientists learn about new drugs?
To better understand what helps people stay healthy, scientists do cohort studies. A cohort is simply a group of people who are alike in some way -- such as having HIV infection. Some cohort studies involve all types of people with HIV -- young, old, male, female, etc. Others look at certain groups, like women or gay men.
In a cohort study, scientists try to learn as much as they can about people's daily experiences in order to see what helps them. The volunteers come in regularly to have blood tests, and at the same time the scientists ask about things that may affect their health -- like what they eat, whether they smoke, drink alcohol or take any medicines.
These studies can be very large, with many thousands of people, and often go on for many years. All the information from these thousands of people helps doctors learn what things help or hurt people over a long period of time.
What do cohort studies say about anti-HIV drugs?
These studies have told us that people on anti-HIV treatment almost always do better than those on no treatment, and people taking HAART live longer and stay healthier than people who take only 1 or 2 drugs.
One of the largest HIV/AIDS cohorts began in 1990. This "Adult/Adolescent Spectrum of Disease Project" has studied over 49,000 people with HIV. By January, 1998, 9,280 had died. Patients on any anti-HIV treatment were less likely to die than those with similar illness who weren't taking anti-HIV medicine. People not taking anti-HIV drugs were 6 times as likely to die as comparable patients on 3-drug HAART combinations.
Another cohort, the HIV Outpatient Study, has followed over 3,500 HIV patients in eight U.S. cities since 1992. In this group, people not taking any anti-HIV treatment were four and a half times as likely to die as comparable patients taking combinations that included a protease inhibitor. Several large studies in Europe have shown the same kind of result.
In San Francisco, the Department of Public Health has kept track of about 95 percent of the city's AIDS patients. Patients taking combinations that included a protease inhibitor were 57 percent less likely to die than people who didn't take any anti-HIV treatment.
The Bottom Line
Anti-HIV drugs are strong medicines that can have serious side effects. And there is still more we need to learn about how to use them to get the best results. But large studies done around the world have all found the same thing: Anti-HIV treatment has helped thousands of people infected with HIV to live longer and stay healthier. The evidence shows that anti-HIV drugs have played a big part in reducing AIDS deaths.
See our Web site (http://www.aidsnews.org) for a PDF version of AIDS Treatment News #354.
ISSN # 1052-4207
Copyright 2000 by John S. James. Permission granted for noncommercial reproduction, provided that our address and phone number are included if more than short quotations are used.
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
To claim that the latest treatment fad is responsible for curbing the toxic/nutritional syndrome currently referred to as "AIDS" is absurd.
According to the AIDS establishment, approximately 200,000 HIV positive individuals are consuming these drugs—and around 50% of those cannot tolerate them (or just drop dead unexpectedly).
That means that out of the 600,000-800,000 HIV-positives, only 100,000 are benefitting from those drugs.
So what the heck is keeping the OTHER 500,000-700,000 HIV-positives healthy?
Are the drugs so miraculous that they prevent disease in people who do not even take them?
Considering all the other fantastic and wondrous claims made in the last twenty years regarding HIV, I would not be surprised.
Click here to learn how the AIDS machine perpetuates its fraudulent claims.
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
Helene Gayle of the CDC admits: no scientific proofs for the existence of HIV adsl-208-188-223-42.dsl.kscymo.swbell.net Sat Jul 8 12:30:15
Press Release - For immediate circulation
Ref.: International World-AIDS-Conference
Dr. Helene Gayle of the CDC Atlanta in front of South African President Thabo Mbeki admits:
Still today there are no scientific proofs for the existence of "HIV" nor for the validity of the tests.
Before the International Aids Conference begins in Durban, the South African President invited experts to two prior meetings where current opinion on HIV and AIDS were critically discussed. President Mbeki had become concerned about the very different views concerning AIDS. His doubts had been particularly aroused by the monotherapy of AZT/Retrovir is have meantime begun to consider this therapy of the late 80´s / early 90´s a big mistake.
On President Bill Clinton´s initiative, representatives of the US Health Agency, CDC, took part in the two meetings. At the last meeting the US Delegation offered to cooperate with South Africa to look for proof of the of the so-called AIDS-Virus HIV and the validity of the tests.
For the first time in the history of AIDS it was decided to try to isolate the so-called AIDS-Virus HIV and thus provide scientific proof of its existence. It was also agreed to seek evidence of the specificity of the tests; that means that the tests only reacts in the presence of antibodies HIV. Something not done yet either.
According to the head of the US Delegation, Dr. Helene, the CDC will participate in these investigations to be undertaken in Africa together with renowned experts. First results are expected some time in December 2000.
This whole undertaking should certainly have been done much, much earlier, and it should not now be necessary to form a new commission to start this investigation at such a late state.
This is, however, the first time that US Health admit that in AIDS no specific Virus has ever been discovered. That there is simply no evidence that HIV is the cause of AIDS. And this 16 years after the then US Secretary of Health, Margaret Hekler on the 23rd April 1984 announced to the whole world the scientific discovery of a virus in with AIDS, also that an application had been made for patenting this "discovery", and, finally, that the US authorities had approved "HIV"-tests.
The failure to isolate the HI-Virus directly affects the validity of the tests, as an indirect method such as an antibody test must be measured against concrete evidence.
The only possibility to prove the existence of the -Virus is the isolation of the specific virus. This has not yet been done. Consequently the tests cannot, with any degree of certainty, show that a person tests positive has actually been infected by a virus.
Conclusion: neither is there proof of the existence of HIV – according to the standard rules of virology – nor is there any scientific for the validity of the antibody tests.
This Press Release is being issued because of the vicious on the South African President, Mr. Thabo Mbeki, in an article initiated by more than 150 scientists, published in the scientific magazine Nature" on the 6 July 2000.
In this article, known as the "Durban Declaration" (see also our press release "The Dishonouring of Science", 29/6/200 ) authors maintained that the hitherto known affirmations on HIV and AIDS comply with the highest scientific standards.
Under the leadership of the German Association Wissenschaft, Medizin und Menschenrechte, e.V." (Science, Medicine and Human) several organisations from different countries (Chechia, Spain, Holland, Italy, England, USA and others) asked the signatories of the Durban Declaration to provide the South African President, and with that the world, with the scientific evidence for the so-called HI-Virus and for the validity of the.
Till this very moment the signatories of the Durban Declaration have not responded, with the exception of the CDC representative, Dr. Helene Gayle, offer to carry out new investigations in South Africa rather contradicts her previous adhesion to the Durban Declaration.
Dortmund & Stuttgart, 7/7/2000
Dr.Stefan Lanka, Karl Krafeld
This press release can also be found on the internet: http://www.aids-info.net durban
Post Extras:
|
|
0 registered and 4 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: TheBody, bogart, crabman, riverprincess, kicker
|
Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 1590
|
|
|
|
|
|

UBB.threads™ 6.2.3
| |