|
bradford
|
|
Fanatic
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 01/15/04
|
|
Posts: 65
|
|
Loc: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
|
|
UNITED STATES DISCRIMINATES AGAINST HIV+ PEOPLE
#111140 - 09/01/04 01:06 PM
|
Reply
|
Quote
|
|
|
UNITED STATES DISCRIMINATES AGAINST HIV+ PEOPLE
While nearly a million HIV+ American citizens enjoy the freedom to leave and travel outside their country, the United States government prohibits HIV+ individuals from other countries entry to the United States! Without a doubt, this ban is the most blatant display of discrimination against HIV+ people to date! This ban continues to fuel discrimination, while a worldwide community strives to stop the stigma and discrimination surrounding HIV and AIDS!
It is obvious that there is little understanding of HIV or compassion from the American government and other countries, which impose such a ban. I am a Canadian. I am OUT about my HIV infection publicly and as such, I am not allowed to visit the United States. Are individuals who are infected with HIV to be continually and indefinitely discriminated against purely on the basis of their viral infection?
At 52 years of age and HIV+ for 20 years, I am unable to enter the United States whether to visit friends or to vacation. I have been unable to submit abstracts for conferences and unable to accept invitations to participate at HIV/AIDS events held in the United States. This problem plagues many HIV+ people forcing them to lie to immigration officers and to hide their medications or worse to stop their medications, which may put them at even greater risk of developing drug resistance and illness!
Today, when families are spread out far and wide all over the world, many are not able to visit their relatives or friends who reside in the United States. Others who wish to enter the USA may have varied reasons for travel such as: seeking and/or receiving specific medical attention, attending conferences and providing HIV education and awareness.
People of all ages and from all walks of life are infected with HIV. This virus may or may not cause progression to disease or death. There are HIV+ individuals living a happy and full life with or without medications. Some individuals who engaged in drug treatments have been able to discontinue their medications for months and even years. There are infected individuals who have never had any immune suppression and have never had any HIV replicated in their bodies. There are individuals who know they are infected but who refuse to be tested for fear of discrimination. There are doctors, nurses and health care workers who were infected accidentally. Some people were infected through receiving HIV tainted blood. There are HIV+ individuals who are now seniors. Infected individuals are in loving relationships. Mothers gave birth and now, their children are grown and having children. There are HIV+ individuals who have survived since the first cases were diagnosed. Any one of the examples above is sufficient reason for removing the ban!
We are not criminals! People infected with HIV are no different from anyone else and are not asking to be different! Unfortunately, they are infected with a virus. When people hear that HIV+ individuals are banned from entering the United States, they are shocked initially and then are disgusted that access is denied on this basis.
This discriminatory ban, which prevents HIV+ individuals from entering the United States is ethically wrong and should be lifted immediately!
Bradford McIntyre, HIV+ 20 years Vancouver, B.C. Canada www.PositivelyPositive.ca
-------------------- Bradford McIntyre
Post Extras:
|
|
DaveyBoy
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 05/06/04
|
|
Posts: 38
|
|
Loc: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
American immigration and authorities claim this is to protect their citizens from HIV positive coming in and infecting other people, apparently they must have a big problem with it?
Some day they will have instant tests to give at the boarder. I do not think the US cares that they are discriminating, I do not think they want any new people.
If John Kerry gets voted in, I hear he is going to lift that, so anyone American, vote for Kerry!
-------------------- www.HIV-AIDS-CHAT.com
www.POZitiveLiving.com
www.HIVsearch.com
www.POZ.ca
Post Extras:
|
|
DaveyBoy
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 05/06/04
|
|
Posts: 38
|
|
Loc: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
John Kerry supports a comprehensive, science-based approach to prevention and reject discrimination against people with HIV/AIDS. He supports integrated care and prevention programs and will work to end the HIV travel and immigration ban. John Kerry will also end the federal ban on syringe exchange and harm reduction programs to prevent the spread of HIV.
More of his POZ helping plans on http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/health_care/aids.html
-------------------- www.HIV-AIDS-CHAT.com
www.POZitiveLiving.com
www.HIVsearch.com
www.POZ.ca
Post Extras:
|
|
DanielMark
|
|
Expert
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 06/06/04
|
|
Posts: 120
|
|
Loc: Ottawa Canada
|
|
|
Having made some cyber friends on-line who reside in the US, I found out that in order to visit, one can apply for an exemption, but the fee is prohibitive to me ($250 US) and that is no guarantee of approval.
The only option currently available is to just go without meds, (I am currently not outwardly ill) something I would not consider doing, or to *hide* my meds in vitamin bottles or something.
The US blatently discriminates against poz people.
I recently even had to decline a paid-for invitation to a music conference because of that.
I certainly hope that GW will be voted out of office come November, and that more humanitarian laws will be introduced around HIV/AIDS. Because right now I feel like a second-class citizen of North America. Or a criminal even.
Daniel in Ottawa deeyh@yahoo.com
-------------------- Follow your honest heart
Post Extras:
|
|
bradford
|
|
Fanatic
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 01/15/04
|
|
Posts: 65
|
|
Loc: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
|
|
|
The following are messages I have received regarding this post.
The HIV-infected international traveler should be advised that >150 countries have established entry restrictions for those seropositive for HIV. Some countries, with the objective of stopping the spread of HIV infection at their borders, serologically screen incoming travelers, particularly those staying for extended visits. Others may deny entry to travelers carrying antiretroviral medications.These restrictions, which target mainly long-term travelers requesting residency or educational or work-related visas, are not endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO), and their effectiveness in limiting the spread of HIV to any given country has been challenged. Nevertheless, to avoid problems, HIV-infected travelers who plan to stay in a country for a substantial period or to work or study abroad should be aware of the policies and requirements of individual countries, usually obtainable from consular officials.(4,5) An unofficial list compiled by the U.S.Department ofState can be found at; http:www.travel.state.gov/HIVtestingreqs.html
------------------------------------
"UNAIDS Criticizes HIV Travel Restrictions" Voice of America [12.06.04] Lisa Schlein
UNAIDS and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) are concerned about the increasing number of countries that impose travel restrictions requiring foreigners test for HIV prior to entry. About 60 countries - including the United States, Russia, China and many Arab countries - require mandatory testing. Most only require the restrictions on long-term visitors, such as students,workers and refugees, but some nations require exams for short-term visitors who plan on touring or conducting business. Both groups call on the 60 countries to lift their travel restrictions, which can discourage people from utilizing HIV prevention and care services, thus driving the disease underground, said Mary Haour-Knipe, HIV/AIDS coordinator for IOM. The policies also may create the false impression that HIV/AIDS is a foreign problem that can be controlled by border restrictions, she said, which could lead to a dangerous complacency in which people do not practice safe sex or take other preventative steps. "There is no public health justification for trying to keep HIV out of the country by requiring people to have a test," said Haour-Knipe. "In fact, it is counter-productive for public health. What it does is, since it excludes people who have HIV, it adds to the climate of stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV." Travelers with HIV do not pose a public health threat, as HIV cannot be transmitted by casual contact, she said.
-------------------- Bradford McIntyre
Post Extras:
|
|
bradford
|
|
Fanatic
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 01/15/04
|
|
Posts: 65
|
|
Loc: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
|
|
|
With regards to my comments, United States Discriminates Against HIV+ People; I received the following information from the Migration Health Services International Organization for Migration (IOM), Geneva Switzerland.
UNAIDS/IOM Statement on HIV/AIDS-related Travel Restrictions, June 2004 http://www.iom.int/en/PDF_Files/HIVAIDS/UNAIDS_IOM_statement_travel_restrictions.pdf
-------------------- Bradford McIntyre
Post Extras:
|
|
0 registered and 5 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: TheBody, bogart, crabman, riverprincess, kicker
|
Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Thread views: 2731
|
|
|
|
|
|

UBB.threads™ 6.2.3
| |