|
|
PLEASE people take a look at this :(
#38056 - 08/10/02 10:34 PM
|
Reply
|
Quote
|
|
|
I got this redness under my armpit today. Its really freaking me out cuz i think i saw somewhere where this happens with HIV. Something in the psoriasis family I believe. The camera flash took away a lot of the reddish color. Also I have a bumpy rash in my upper thighs. I'll spare you the pic of that one.
This is a major blow for me. I was doing pretty good and now I have this baloney and its really upsetting me. Please people give me your honest opinion on this. Yet again this is another NEW symptom, without being pos like 18 months.
I would appreciate any knowledge or support anyone has on this. Its really depressing.

Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
Hey Man don't freak out too much i HAve the same thing and also sometimes fear that it is HIV related but the thing is that i have gotten this thing alt least twice a year since i was 18 and i am now 25. sometimes it burns so much that i take 4 showers a day. It also can last as long as 3 months. i have tested neg 6 times
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
one more thing, maybe you should change deoderant and change soaps, i switched from deoderant to antipresperant(the white chalky kind) and that helps
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
yeah i figured somebody would mention that. ive been using this deoderant for 3 years though! its not like i just switched or anything...
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
Hang in there bud,I had a rash on my upper left shoulder that looks like that about a month ago ,wasn't as big but looked lke that.It lasted about 5 days ,and you know ive tested neg at 8 months.I don't know what it is but don't think its to do with hiv.Other then your rash how are you doing ,have you had anymore tests latley?Take care and wish you the best.
Post Extras:
|
|
Anonymous One
|
|
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey uhoh you tested neg. at six months or beyond. Regardless of symptoms...a neg. at > six months is a neg. regardless of symptoms remember! You've heard some of the EXPERTS here experts like Jackie, etc. state so. How would you feel if you had swollen nodes (read my previous posts) and you get a reply like I have? I develop symptoms first, not jumping to conclusions and do some research...I get a reply like that (typical WW) from Jackie...A true WW doesn't have symptoms FIRST. I did not even think HIV until symptoms developed. I could see it had I of reacted FIRST w/o symptoms thinking about HIV. In answer to your question, it does not appear HIV related to me, but then again, I'M NO EXPERT! Oh, and by the way Jackie, What is your payoff for being an advocate for those that possibly exceeded the six month mark and still test negative with doubts due to symptoms, while quite possibly being positive? From what I recall reading correctly, you don't know your exact exposure date, did not have any symptoms, yet you preach six months is completly accurate...regardless of symptoms. I have to wonder...why did you ever get tested in the first place? And I still ponder the thought, whose payroll are you on? Have you ever consider the thought that possibly the JUMP in HIV infection is actually only showing now...well beyond the six month period, and these may be people that trusted their original neg. antibody test? To reiterate: if the ELISA is that foolproof, I would think the blood banks would go with that as gospel. Instead, a doubtful WB and the likes are used to confirm a pos. ELISA...oooookkkkkkkk. And in reality to rule out infection and be totally certain, upon our initial evaluation, WE WOULD GET THE SAME TESTS AS THE BLOOD BANKS USE TO TRULY RULE OUT INFECTION! AND YES, I KNOW MY BODY!!!
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
Uhoh, remember you are negative by ELISA well beyond the window period. That's conclusive. The distribution of that rash suggests it is excema/allergic. I think you are jumping to conclusions about it being HIV related. Relax - you're OK. Take care.
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
You really need to calm down. You remind me of a teenager that knows their point is shaky so they they just yell louder. No you didn't read correctly. I'm not sure of my exposure date, however the 'flu' I had in late November my doctor says was ARS. So yes, I did have symptoms. Matter of fact, I had 'classic' ARS if there is such a thing. I just didn't know it was ARS. I thought it was the Flu. Worse flu I every had. I would have had to have been dead 3 days to feel better. Why did I test? Because my doctor had me testing routinely, because my husband was positve. Those of us in a relationship with a positive person need to test every 6 months or once a year, which ever are doctor thinks is best. I didn't test because I thought I was infected. I tested because it was time.
I don't have a payoff for trying to get people to move on with their lives after testing negative. Look at you all. You make your lives miserable because you refuse to believe your tests. Your whole lives are wrapped up in this. I've seen people on this board lose their families, jobs, friends, etc. because they have refused to believe their results. The sad thing is so many times, they finally do believe, but not until they have ruined their lives. Here you all are with maybe a one time exposure, many times not even an exposure that needs to be tested, not even knowing the status of your partners (probably negative), symptoms that have nothing to do with HIV, yet you remain stuck in all the filtercarb of thinking you are positive.
Remember that neighbor I mentioned. The one that found out she was HIV when she had a routine test because she was pregnant? Well of course they tested her boyfriend. After years of unprotected sex he tested negative out to 6 months. They told him he can rest assured he has remained negative. Now he accepts that negative and he certainly has more reasons not to than any of you on this board.
I've noticed that about this board. People with real reasons to worry don't post here. It's just people that really don't have an exposure and are obessing about this that post. Then you all seem to feed of each other, making each other worse. The last person I remember actually having a reason to worry was the girl that found out the guy she had been sleeping with was indeed HIV postive. She got her negative and moved on. She believed her test. It only seems to be the people without a real cause for worry that can't seem to move on. It makes me wonder what issues you all should be facing that it's easier to focus on something you don't have than to face the real issue. It must be a real big one. I mean it seems you all would rather make your lives miserable than to deal with whatever it is you should be dealing with. It just doesn't make any sense to me.
You all only know about HIV from what you read on the net. You only look at one side, the side that will prove you are positive after testing negative. But when faced with something that might really prove your point, you all freak. Kimberly's story is a great example. You all have no discredited the story. Called The Body irresponbile for putting the article up. Anything you can, to discredit the story, because it's a little to close to the truth you are really looking for. I'm surprised. I figured you all would be overjoyed to find the proof of what you all seek. Maybe I shouldn't be surprised. I've seen the board jump on someone and discredit them, just because they post with a real reason to worry. It's like you a want to worry, but God forbid you find a real reason to worry. You turn on anything that hits to close to home like a bunch of Hyenas. If you know anything about Hyenas, you know they are some of the most vicious animals around. They hunt in a pack and rip their prey limb from limb.
I do have an advantage over most of you. I can see the other side. Let's face it. I imagine most if not all of you don't know anyone HIV. If you did, you could talk to them, instead of posting here. The REAL side of this disease through people that actually have to deal with HIV. I got to tell you, these people are much nicer and less crazy and more down to earth then the people that post on this board.
You all are ruining your lives over something you have no reason to worry about. I know I can't do anything about it. If you're deadset to do that, you will. At least I can try to put some common sense in the middle of this mass hysteria that you all create.
J.
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
Nothing like a hairy armpit before I've had my coffee. That must be painful. It looks nasty. Never had anything like that so I wouldn't know what caused it. I would suggest instead of putting up with it and thinking it's due to HIV, you get to a doctor and find out what it really is and get something from the doc that will clear it up. Doesn't that make more sense than showing it to us?
J.
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
Anxiety produces an overabundance of histamine which in turn produces rashes.
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
that's just nasty
Post Extras:
|
|
shadow1
|
|
Legend
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 12/06/00
|
|
Posts: 1209
|
|
|
|
|
Uhoh, This looks like a rash caused by not getting all the soap out of the shirt you were wearing on a hot day or a day you did something that caused alot of sweat. I used to get a rash alot like that one and had to start running my clothes through the rince cycle twice. When I did that it cleared right up and I have never had the problem since. Remember not everything is HIV related. Quit being so critical of your body, you have taken every test in the book beyond the 6mo timeframe. If you were infected it would of showen up already.
The G-Man
S.S.D.D.
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
Hey g-man you like nice pits go for it!
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
Its me again, ihave swith to a differnt deoderant each time that the rash comes back. Right now i am using my girlfriends deoderant and the rash is gone. Like i said i did not develope the rash till i was 18 after using the same deoderant for 5 years. it my not be an allergic reaction but just that the skin is sensitive to what ever ingrediant that is in the deodorant.
Post Extras:
|
|
|
|
amen sister
-------------------- Faith, love and persistance!
Post Extras:
|