The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Sign up for free e-mail updates!The Body en Espanol
Please Note: Due to volume considerations, not all questions can be answered. Questions most likely to be answered will be those of general interest to a broad group of visitors to this forum. Questions pertaining to a specific case; requests for diagnosis, medical advice, or second opinion; or requests for opinions about untested alternative therapies will generally not be answered.

Ask the Experts about Workplace and Insurance Issues
Recent AnswersAsk a Question

 

Pre-existing condition, not!
May 17, 2006

Hello, I was recently tested positive and diagnosed with Acute Retroviral Syndrome. I had begun insurance coverage with Blue Cross over 6 months before and had paid my premiums faithfully and fully. I began seeing a primary care physician and had two negative HIV tests prior to the ARS diagnosis. I had noticed fevers and some symptoms and had gone to the doctor and recommended she test me for Viral Load (I'm a health care professional). She ran RNA and another Elisa and the elisa came back negative but the RNA indicated I had HIV. This indicated that I had an Acute HIV infection. She then referred me to a specialist and now my Blue Cross is denying claims right and left. They are paying for my medications but not for any labs or physician visits. I checked my policy and there is a 12 month waiting period for "pre-existing conditions". Is this something I can fight? I did not have insurance for almost 2 years preceding this policy. I have lab work that proves this is not a pre-existing condition. Thanks for any information about this situation.

--A

Response from Ms. Franzoi

You should review the pre-exisitng condition language in your policy carefully. In some policies, in addition to language that refers to any condition you saw a physician for, took medication for, etc., it might state or a condition for which a reasonable person would've seen a physician. Based on your information that you saw a physician for fevers, etc. and your physician ran tests, even though they came back negative, this might be the basis for their actions. However, you might want to discuss this with an attorney or a legal aid group to see if you have any options. A lot depends on the actual policy language and your dates of medical care from a physician.



Terms of Use
Please remember that this forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not engaged through this forum in rendering legal or medical advice or professional services. Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither The Body nor any sponsor is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Questions and messages posted to this forum are not statements of advice, opinion, or information of The Body, Body Health Resources Corporation or any sponsor of this forum. While neither The Body nor Body Health Resources Corporation regularly reviews posted content, we reserve the right to delete, move, or edit postings if we deem it appropriate under the circumstances. Visitors submitting questions remain solely responsible for the content of their messages.

Information provided by experts is general only and should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease, or relied upon as legal or other professional advice. This information is not a substitute for professional advice or care. If you have or suspect you may have a health or legal problem, you should consult your own health care provider or your attorney.

Copyright notice.