Please Note: Due to volume considerations, not all questions can be answered. Questions most likely to be answered will be those of general interest to a broad group of visitors to this forum. Questions pertaining to a specific case; requests for diagnosis, medical advice, or second opinion; or requests for opinions about untested alternative therapies will generally not be answered.
|
 |
 |
New LTD application: HIV+ and healthy
Oct 31, 2007
I am a very healthy woman who has been HIV+ for almost 10 years. CD4 >900 and VL undetectable on meds. I am a Canadian considering overseas employment with a US organization. They tell me their LTD insurance may not provide coverage for pre-existing conditions - that it would depend on an assessment by the insurance provider and an independent medical assessment at the time of the request. I would say it is highly unlikely that I would fall seriously ill as a result of HIV in the next few years. However, I wonder if you can tell me if HIV+ people tend to have problems in cases like this with insurance providers who try to argue that something is HIV related in order to avoid approving the claim on the basis of it being a pre-existing condition. Say I developed heart disease or breast cancer (god forbid). Am I too cynical?
Thanks
Louise
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Response from Ms. Franzoi

Typically, HIV+ individuals have difficulty obtaining LTD coverage from insurance companies on an individual basis. However, if the US organization has a group long term disability plan, if you were to elect coverage during your initial eligiblity period, you should be able to get coverage. Although the plan would have a pre-existing condition clause in it, that typically would only be for an AIDS-related illness during the firtst 12 months of coverage. If you were to become disabled after 12 monthsof coverage, all illnesses, AID-related or not, would be covered. Ask the employer for a copy of the summary plan description that explains how pre-exisitng condtions are treated. In response to your other question re denial of benefits, unless the illness could be deemed AIDS-related (like certain cancers), I don't see them denying the benefit.
|
|
 |
 Please remember that this forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not engaged through this
forum in rendering legal or medical advice or professional services. Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible
for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither The Body nor any sponsor is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.
Questions and messages posted to this forum are not statements of advice, opinion, or information of The Body, Body Health Resources Corporation or any sponsor of this
forum. While neither The Body nor Body Health Resources Corporation regularly reviews posted content, we reserve the right to delete, move, or
edit postings if we deem it appropriate under the circumstances. Visitors submitting questions remain solely responsible for the content of their
messages.
Information provided by experts is general only and should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease, or relied upon as
legal or other professional advice. This information is not a substitute for professional advice or care. If you have or suspect you may have a
health or legal problem, you should consult your own health care provider or your attorney.
Copyright notice.
|
|
|
|