|Followup to a Dec 1 question
Feb 25, 2007
Dr. Conway Your Dec 1 response http://thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SideEffects/Current/Q180163.html) re the use of Resistance Testing to identify HIV exposure in a case of persistently negative antibody and viral load testing raises some serious questions: 1) Authorities on The Body and other web forums consistently say that a negative HIV antibody test after 3-6 moths following known exposure means that a person must be HIV negative, irrespective of any symptoms they have. So why did you keep testing in this particular case? 2) Under what circumstances would you do additional testing on a person that has repeatedly negative HIV antibody tests for more than 1-2 years?
Response from Dr. Conway
I kept testing because the person had clear-cut HIV-related severe oppportunistic infections, and this would be the only setting in which I would persist in doing repeated testing in the face of a negative HIV antibody test result.
what else could it be ?
- Gave Oral And Got A Mouth Ulcer Two Days Later
- Hiv Transmission In Lesbians Grinding/frottage Or Oral Sex
- Is A Hiv Test After 3 Months Reliable?
- Oraquick Oral Fluid Test Reliability
- Low Lymphocyte Count Hiv Negative
- Is It Against The Law To Have Sex With Someone And Not Tell Them That You Have Hiv?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.