Nov 13, 2006
I was reading an article discussing the use of radioimmunotherapy for HIV treatment. It sounds very intersting. However in this article from webmd, they were noting that HAART treatment is only sucessful in about two thirds of patients. I thought the sucess rate was much much higher. Can you comment on this and do have any opinion on the use of radioimmunotherapy?
Response from Dr. Conway
I am not sure I have any comments about radioimmunotherapy other than to quote the recent article:
Dadachova E et al. Targeted killing of virally infected cells by radiolabelled antibodies to viral proteins. PloS Medicine 3 (11): e427, 2006.
This suggests interesting preliminary results in mice, without any human data as of yet.
The data that you quote suggesting that HAART is only effective in two thirds of patients is based on the fact that, in many clinical trials, if someone stops treatment due to side effects or if they have to change treatment for any reason, this counts as if they had failed HAART. If someone is taking HAART, tolerates it, responds to it and keeps taking it, over 95% of people keep responding.
Fatty acid deficiency?
- Is It Hard For Women To Give Hiv To Men?
- Can You Test Negative For Hiv A Year After Exposure?
- What Precautions Can You Take If Someone Has Herpes?
- What Organs Are Affected By Syphilis?
- What Are The Chances Of Getting Herpes From Infected Person?
- What If You Have Chlamydia For Over A Year?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.