|Two questions.... please?
Mar 23, 2004
Ok first question:
Do you believe that what is now seen in loss of body tissues in HIV positive people on HAART has more to do with fat and less to do with muscle?
Also, isn't it true that rhGH can speed up an existing cancer in someone? Since HIV raises the risk of cancer significantly more than any other known disease, isn't it wise to assume many HIV positive people are already in the very early and undetectible stages of a developing cancer, and that administering rhGH to them is just helping this along?
Response from Dr. Conway
First, it appears that the morphologic changes associated with HIV and its treatment are more due to loss or over accumulation of fat, and have little to do with muscle. You are right.
RhGH has been used for the treatment of many such conditions. It can be associated with some side effects such as joint pains and also glucose intolerance (or even diabetes). I am not aware of it being associated with an increased risk of cancers of any kind.
Jaundice from Reyataz
- What Stage In Hiv Do Night Sweats Occur Early Or Late?
- Can I Get Hep C From Swallowing Semen?
- What Color Is The Fluid Inside Herpes Blisters?
- What Can You Do To Make A Person More Comfortable Who Has Shingles?
- Risk Of Transmitting Herpes Through Kissing
- Time Lapse For Genital Herpes Infection
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.