Jun 2, 2002
I really am interseting in getting into the smart study.Hoping to be put in the wait(no drugs) arm.The only thing that scares me is the cd4 cut off is 250.Being someone who always has 1000 this to me seems risky,however I would LOVE nothing more than to be off meds.I know my doctor is going to say this number is too low.I wish there were a study that had a higher cutoff.What's your opinion?P.S.- gerally great health,chronic infection,just cometic side effects and lipids.Hav been on medication 6 years.
| Response from Dr. Henry
The risk for any AIDS-related events is extremely low if the CD4 count > 250 (the starting time for therapy in the drug conservation arm of the SMART study). 50% of persons in the SMART trial get randomized to the continuous therapy arm and 50% into the drug conservation arm (= stop drugs until CD4 count reaches 250). In many European countries the initial level of CD4 count whereby treatment is recommended is in the 200-250 range. We don't know the best way to use potent antiretroviral therapy for the long haul (> 5-10 years) when you balance viral suppression early versus toxicity and resistance issues. If your CD4 count was never too low (< 200) and viral load never too high (>>100,000) then stopping meds is safer than if the CD4 count had been low . KH
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Would My Boyfriend Get Chlamydia If I Didn't Tell Him The First Time
- Will Z Pack Take Care Of Bacterial Vaginosis?
- Does Herpes Look Like Pimples?
- Will I Still Have Symptoms After Being Treated For Chlamydia?
- Why Does Chlamydia Infect Woman More Than Men?
- What Do Shingles On The Body Look Like?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.