Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
   
Ask the Experts About

Safe Sex and HIV PreventionSafe Sex and HIV Prevention
           
Rollover images to visit our other forums!
Recent AnswersAsk a Question
  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary


Is It Possible??
Dec 10, 2001

I have a friend who found out that she was HIV positive. She was dating this guy and she was told by some friends that he die of AIDS. She instantly got tested for HIV and she tested positive. However, she has been dating this other guy for approx. 4.5 years, and he also tested for HIV; however he tested Negative. Is it possible, that he really does not have HIV, or will it show up later. How is that so???

Response from Mr. Kull

First of all, it is possible that he is infected and still got a negative HIV result if he had been tested during the window period. It takes up to three months to develop a detectable level of antibodies as measured by antibody screening tests. If someone is tested less than three months after their last exposure, the test may not be accurate. It is important that this guy has an HIV antibody test performed three or more months following his last exposure and to avoid any significant exposures during the window period. It is rare that someone would take six months or longer to develop a detectable level of antibodies.

Some people do not get infected when having unprotected sex with their HIV infected partners. The reasons behind this are not always clear, but it does happen. Studies conducted in the United States have suggested that insertive (male)partners in vaginal sex are at less risk for infection than the receptive partners (the person in whom the penis is inserted). However, transmission is possible to the insertive partner (as demonstrated by the dramatic levels of infection among heterosexual men worldwide), so condom use is important. Other hypotheses exist to explain the lack of transmission in certain cases: circumcised men may be at less risk than uncircumcised men when engaging in insertive sex; some people may be less prone to infection due to inherited genetic resistance; the lack of STDs may reduce a person's risk for infection, and; the infected person's viral load may play a role in the likelihood of transmission.

If your friend's partner remains uninfected, that's a good thing. It will be important for them to figure out how they want to reduce his risk for infection in the future. However, it is important to not assume, based on their experience, that other people may have the same good fortune that your friend's partner did if they continue to have unprotected sex.

RMK



Previous
test results there, too scared to go in!
Next
biting question Pls answer!!!!!

  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS


 
 
Advertisement



Q&A TERMS OF USE

This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.

Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.

Powered by ExpertViewpoint

Advertisement