significant public health matter?
Nov 19, 1997
Rick, thanks for your wonderful service! I have a question
that seems to have public health ramifications, so, I ask it
in a spirit of genuine concern. The CDC tells callers that there are only
2 recorded cases of seroconversion after the 6 month "window" and
Dr. Joel Gallant, on another Body web page, repeatedly states that
greater than 99.999% of infected people will test positive by 6 months
and that only a couple cases of seroconv. taking longer than 6 months
have been recorded. However, you suggest that all anyone can say about
seroconv. statistics is that 99% percent of infected persons will have
seroconv. by 6 months. Herein lies my concern: You and CDC/Gallant differ in
your characterization of post-6 month seroconverters by as much as one % point.
Although this may seem trivial, when dealing with large populations, would'nt
the difference suggest a large number of people could take longer
than 6 months. For example, if in any given year, about
20,000 people actually test positive for HIV (according to CDC stats.),
then the one percent which you suggest could take longer than
6 months equates to 200 people who may be infected.
Isnt this difference of a mere percentage point, when projected to
large populations, a significant difference? Which, then, is more correct
to say: that there are only a couple of documented cases (thus, quite rare),
or that about 99% of people will have seroconverted (leaving one to
surmise that 200 hundred a year could be unknowingly infected)?
Response from Mr. Sowadsky
Hi. Thank you for your question. If you read my answers regarding the accuracy of the HIV antibody tests, you will note it states, "The MAXIMUM period of time that an infected person will show positive on the test is 6 months. By this point in time, MORE THAN 99% of infected persons will show positive on the test. This is as accurate as any test in medicine could ever be..... At 6 months, the tests are MORE THAN 99% accurate."
You cannot just ignore the words "more than". There really is no conflicting information here. It is simply that different people are stating the SAME facts using different words. Sometimes people try to take things word-for-word, without realizing there are different ways to say the same thing. Let's not try to make things more complicated than they are! However you want to word it, be it "more than 99% accurate", "99.99% accurate", whatever, it all says the same thing. Simply put, it is extremely rare for a person to start testing positive longer than 6 months. That's it.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to call the Centers for Disease Control at 1.800.232.4636 (Nationwide).
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Is Swollen Lymph Nodes A Sign Of Acute HIV Infection?
- Blood In Semen After Anal Sex Worried I Have HIV
- Itchy Skin After Precum Touching Vagina Sign Of HIV AIDS
- Pain In Urethra After Getting Fingered Worried I Have
- Rash After Giving Oral Worried I Have HIV
- Sore Testicles After Licking Vagina Worried I Have HIV
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.