Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Read Now: TheBodyPRO.com Covers AIDS 2014
   
Ask the Experts About

Safe Sex and HIV PreventionSafe Sex and HIV Prevention
           
Rollover images to visit our other forums!
Recent AnswersAsk a Question
  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary


Circumcision
May 12, 1997

Is there a direct link between non-circumcision and HIV infection? What I mean is I have heard that a person who is not circumcized is more likely to get infected. Why is that? I had protected vaginal intercourse with a prostitute and after hearing this, I'm worried. Can you give me any information on this issue?

Response from Mr. Sowadsky

Hi. Thank you for your question.

There have indeed been studies showing that uncircumcised men were at greater risk of acquiring HIV, as compared to circumsized men. This is most likely due to two reasons.

The first is an increased chance of genital ulcer disease (like chancroid and syphilis) in uncircumcised men. These men may not be aware that they have an open lesion (due to these diseases), if the foreskin covers the lesion. Such an occurance is especially likely with syphilis, since a syphilis lesion (called a chancre) is painless, and may therefore not be noticed. When a person has an open lesion (like those due to chancroid, syphilis, herpes etc.), it's much easier for HIV to enter the bloodstream, and therefore cause infection.

The second possibility is that if an uncircumcised man does not practice good genital hygiene, he is more likely to develop genital infections, which could then lead to a breakdown in the integrity of the skin. When the integrity of the skin is broken down, this too, can allow HIV to enter the bloodstream easier.

Overall, if an uncircumcised man practices good genital hygiene, he is at no greater risk of infection that a circumcised man. But if an uncircumcised man does not practice good genital hygiene, he may be at greater risk of infection than a circumcised man, due to the increased chances of other genital infections.

If a man has protected sex (uses a condom), whether he is circumcised or not, his risks are low, as long as he uses the condom correctly, and it does not break, leak, or fall off.

If you have any further questions, please feel free to call the Centers for Disease Control at 1.800.232.4636 (Nationwide).



Previous
Studies re: HIV transmission in Gay men
Next
Risk from Saliva Exposed to Mucous Membranes

  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS


 
Advertisement



Q&A TERMS OF USE

This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.

Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.

Powered by ExpertViewpoint

Advertisement