|Occupational exposures; the difference?
May 26, 2013
Greetings from Canada Shannon!
Recently I read that when it comes to occupational exposures the vast majority have been due to needle sticks and that transmission via blood splash to the eye, nose, mouth, etc is only theoretical. Is that true or false? Are there actually documented cases of blood splash leading to hiv and if so what were the circumstances?
I spoke with my Doctor about this and he told me that in many cases PEP can be offered for a blood splash exposure but that he and others do not recommend it like they would where a needlestick is involved. Is there a reason for that?
| Response from Ms. Southall
Hi Yes theoretically HIV transmission can happen through splash but needle stick carries the higher risk, but it is only at about a 3% risk. I have not seen any documented cases of splash HIV transmission all of the occupational exposures I have seen documented are from needle sticks. Placing someone on PEP after occupational exposure is a good practice and yes most of the exposure recommendations are for needle stick and not splash because of the reduced risk that it carries. If you want to get on PEP it needs to be within 72 hours of the exposure.
Be well and get tested
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.