NAT vs. antibody testing question
Mar 13, 2012
Hello~ I have read several posts on this site that discuss NAT and how accurate those tests are, but many of those posts are years old (I think the most recent one I found was from 2008 or 2009 that stated a 3 month antibody test was still the gold standard to go off of). I was wondering if you could give some more updated information on the accuracey of NAT when it comes to HIV and Hep B and C?
If a person were tested using NAT after 4 weeks (28 days), would a negative result be considered conclusive for HIV and Hep B and C, or would they still need an antibody test at the 3-6 month mark to be conclusive?
Response from Dr. Wohl
NAT or nucleic acid testing looks for actual virus rather than the antibodies the body produces in response to an infection. NAT has been used to do viral load testing for viral infections such as HIV.
The testis very accurate. False negatives are much rarer than false positives. A negative NAT for HIV after 4 weeks with negative HIV antibody means no infection.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- What Kind Of Antibiotics Should Be Used To Treat Bacterial Vaginosis?
- What Is The Test Called Where They Check For You Chlamydia?
- What Is The Incubation Period For Hpv?
- What Are Different Ways Can You Catch Herpes?
- What Are The Long Term Effects Of Histoplasmosis?
- What Are The Chances Of Getting Herpes When No Outbreaks?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.