3 month testing is only 85% reliable- recent research?
Aug 13, 2010
dr. bob hi. I hope u r well. I'm concerned because the drs on medhelp are now saying a 3 month rapid test is only 85% reliable due to new research. is this so? I had negative lab tests at 6 & 9 weeks and negative RNA pcrs as 10 days and at 9 weeks
but my 13 week test was a rapid one are my results still woohooable? :( I'm so terrified of having to take another HIV test
also are u aware or the research that these drs are referencing? do u know how they concluded that it's only 85? please post this. I hope all is well
Response from Dr. Frascino
Sorry, I have no idea what these physicians are talking about. There is no new research that I am aware of pertaining to the reliability of rapid tests. I would suggest you ask the physicians who wrote about this for additional information about the new research. Report back to us if it's anything more than a misunderstanding or misstatement, OK?
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Heterosexual Chances Of Getting Hiv
- Ethical Issues On Improper Disclosure Of Protected Health Information On Patients With Hiv Or Aids
- Can You Work In The Food Industry If You Have Hiv?
- How Rapidly Can One Die From Hiv If Treatment Starts Too Late?
- Staph Infection And Hiv
- Are Canker Sores Hiv Symptoms?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.