|PEP Guideline Question
Aug 1, 2009
Dear Dr. Bob,
I finally realized that I am addicted to your site since I have to check your new postings every day.
I remember reading one of your threads that PEP does not (or rarely) cause delayed seroconversion. Therefore, is it true that the current PEP Guideline is not really for the sake of PEP, rather for the severity of exposure?
For example, unprotected culliningus on an unknown status lady (PEP not warranted): no matter PEP was administered or not, 3-month testing is conclusive.
Unprotective receptive anal sex with a virally enhanced dude (PEP warranted): No matter PEP was taken or not, 6-month testing is required.
Your still worried Canucks
| Response from Dr. Frascino
Hi Still Worried Canuck,
Yep. The post-PEP testing guidelines are the same as testing guidelines for a significant HIV exposure.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.