|oraquick advance hiv-1/2
Nov 26, 2008
The finger prick test. Do you personally believe in the results of these tests? Im asking for your personal belief and not mumbo jumbo government scripts. I follow your forums and believe your more informed than my local clinic. I tested negative at week 6 and week 8 with this test. I know that its not conclusive but I dont want to depend on one sole test plus I read that most serocovert in 4-6 weeks. The clinic tried pushing me away saying its too early and at 8 weeks its most likely going to be false negative. MOST LIKELY!? Jeez....What gives?
| Response from Dr. Frascino
I always give my personal opinion and if I include "mumbo jumbo government scripts," I always make sure to credit the information source.
I haven't seen any problems with the finger prick OraQuick Advance tests. The information you read about most HIV-infected folks having detectable levels of anti-HIV antibodies in their blood by four to six weeks is accurate. However, "most" is certainly not good enough when dealing with a disease as catastrophic as HIV/AIDS. The clinic was correct to try to push you away until the threee-month mark, as HIV-antibody tests taken prior to this are not considered to be definitive or conclusive. Their comment about "most likely to be a false negative" was not accurate.
Hope that helps in a non-mumbo-jumbo-kind-of-way.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.