Making babies or playing safe? Safe sex equals human extinction, doesn't it?
Jul 9, 2008
I'm not the pope or a member of catholic church. I'm indeed evangelic but the phrase or message: "safer sex for all... no glove, no love, no exceptions" is absolute bullshit for me. So let us go to human extinction or better, only babies from the tube. Please don't missunderstand me. I have no connection to the church or any other religious organization but I simply can't accept that we can't continue having babies on the natural way and staying to the message above it seems that you encourage that. If both are negative there's no reason to make sex with condom. Do you agree?
Response from Dr. Frascino
My comment, "safer sex for all . . . no glove, no love, no exceptions," was obviously referring to non-procreational sex! At least it seemed obvious to me. But just in case there are other readers who have had their "keen sense of the obvious" surgically removed, let me remind all couples trying to make a baby that you need to take the condom off, OK?
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Risk Of HIV Transmission From Touching Penis
- What Is The Risk Of Getting HIV From Cut On Hand?
- Is Red Eyes A Symptom Of Acute HIV Infection?
- Diarrhea After Blowjob Worried I Have HIV
- Flu Symptoms After Licking Vagina Worried I Have HIV
- Vomiting After Vaginal Sex Without Condom Does It Mean I Have HIV
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.