The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Living With HIV: Watch Aaron's Story
Ask the Experts About

Safe Sex and HIV PreventionSafe Sex and HIV Prevention
Rollover images to visit our other forums!
Recent AnswersAsk a Question
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

Feb 9, 2008

Hi, I'm a male late 30s. I know you've touched on this issue before, but I was hoping to get more specifics on my somewhat unique quandry.

My girlfiend insisted that I do a Western Blot _after_ my ELISA test. The ELISA for HIV 1/2 came back 'Negative' - but my WB returned as:


The specimen exhibits non-specific binding w/ the nitrocellulose strip used in the HIV-1 Antibody WB assay. The result is uninterpretable. Suggest repeating HIV-1/2 EIA assay on a second specimen"

This was before I came across all the research (esp your site) proclaiming the WB as 'confirmatory test' only.

The thing that is freaking me out a little is that factors cited that lead to "indeterminate" result - none of them apply to me.

So why was my WB 'Uninterpretable?'

Today I had the RNA PCR test performed (at potentially great $$ to me) because I want to be 100% sure I'm negative, and I _do not_ want to keep taking the WB over and over again just to find out I'm a "stable-indeterminate" - which wouldn't reassure me about _anything_. Results should arrive in a week.

BTW, my window period has been at least 3 months (we're talking Octoberm, and all I did was dryhump w/ a different female of unkown status in our underoos. Last penetrative sexual encounter was mid summer '07, again someone else of unknown status (unknown being she didn't have a medical report to back up her claim of being neg).

So while I wait for the PCR results, what can you tell me about the WB that doesn't apply to pregant women, people who are seroconverting (hoping! that's not the case), suffering some other illness, etc etc)

I promise I will tell any and ALL to get the ELISA _ONLY_. And then only if it comes back twice-positive do you get the WB, not the other way.

Just need some ammo.

Thank you Dr. Bob - you are a wonderful resourse.

Response from Dr. Frascino


How can I explain specifics on the results of a test that should never have been ordered? Your ELISA HIV-1/2 is negative, so you are HIV negative. Period. End of story.

"Uninterpretable results" are exactly that "uninterpretable."

There are many technical reasons for indeterminate Western Blots (WBs) other than the ones you mention. I see no reason to go into technical details about this, because they don't apply to your situation. You are HIV negative, not "indeterminate." To have an "indeterminate" HIV test result you would need a repeatedly positive ELISA followed by an indeterminate WB.

HIV is not your problem. No way. No how.

Dr. Bob

Why do they say that?

  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS



This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.

Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.

Powered by ExpertViewpoint