Jun 2, 2007
I recently had unprotected intercourse with a woman who I would characterize as low-risk. I have always been careful with my partners (until this one) and ended up freaking out the next day (until this encounter, I would also characterize myself as low-risk)...so, I waited until day 12 and ordered a commercially-developed (through a large lab company) qualitative DNA PCR....it came back 'detected'. I plan to follow-up with antibody screening, but, as can be expected, this is causing me huge amounts of stress.
So, my question is: what is your experience with false-positives with this type of test?
I didn't do much research prior to ordering the test, but have since found the information on false positive rates to be sketchy and inconsistent, at best.
Thanks in advance.
| Response from Dr. Frascino
Your unfortunate experience once again clearly demonstrates the dangers and potential downside of trying to use a test for purposes for which it was not intended or approved. HIV DNA PCR testing is not considered sufficiently accurate for HIV diagnosis without confirmation from approved testing techniques. Your only option at this time is to wait for your three-month HIV antibody test to get an accurate and conclusive result.
I'm confident you've learned several lessons from this experience. First, unprotected sex isn't worth the risk. Second, PCR testing should not be used for routine HIV screening. Hopefully your testimonial will help others avoid winding up in similar situations. Write back with your three-month definitive test result and I'll publish your follow-up report.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.