The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Ask the Experts About

Safe Sex and HIV PreventionSafe Sex and HIV Prevention
Rollover images to visit our other forums!
Recent AnswersAsk a Question
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary


Jan 12, 2007

Silly me I had a fling with a guy who was HIV+ just over three months ago in the summer and there was condom use (thank god) but as his status was unknown at the time (he found out he was HIV+ only two days later and at least had the moral compass to tell me) we may have done some heavy prodding/poking/teasing that could have caused some fluids to jump around in risky areas. In any case, I immediately put myself on the stand-by and waited a while for my HIV 1-2 ELISA test. During this waiting period I developed a mild fever for a few days and subsequently a red rash that went all over my trunk, arms, legs...(ironically not on my palms or soles that I or a doctor could see). Granted it caused a bit of panic for me. I got my ELISA test and, as well, got a VDRL as syphilis is on the rise in my city. I got the results back yesterday with the ELISA showing negative (hallelujah) but the VDRL showing positive and was sent for further confirmatory testing for syphilis. (Who would have ever thought I'd be happy to have syphilis??)

My question to you is has there been any documented cases where a VDRL test would show early HIV infection (hence a positive test) or is this test (as sensitive as it is for detecting many non-syphilis causes) simply not looking for the proper proteins to even slightly detect early HIV infection? I imagine if it was a good gauge of picking up early HIV infection, everyone would use it instead of simply jumping into an expensive PD4..(?) While I feel confident that I don't have HIV (another test in 3 months just to clear the 6 month window) and likely do have syphilis (butt-shot penecillin city) it would be good to know if the VDRL does pick up HIV infection at least so someone who feels they were at risk could go and have the test earlier than they can have an ELISA and if they test positive in the VDRL, can eliminate Syphilis as the cause and then maybe request a PD4. In any case, I think it would be good to know as people seem to be less scared to get a test under the guise of a VDRL than they do for HIV...

Response from Dr. Frascino


No. VDRL and HIV ELISA tests are two completely different and unrelated tests.

You are HIV negative and syphilis positive. That means WOO-HOO and "butt-shot penicillin city!!!"

Dr. Bob

Dr Bob thank you i'm sending my donation today by paypal.
quick qustion about being Unhealthy

  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS



This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.

Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.

Powered by ExpertViewpoint