The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Ask the Experts About

Safe Sex and HIV PreventionSafe Sex and HIV Prevention
Rollover images to visit our other forums!
Recent AnswersAsk a Question
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

questions about risks of exposure

Oct 3, 2006


First I would like to say that this site is absolutely one of the most educational and efficient sites I have seen. You are wonderful! I think it is great to actually have an educated individual available to answer questions. Although there is tons of information available on the internet, sometimes it is difficult to sort through fact and fiction, as well as find information pertainat to ones question.

My questions are as follows:

1) I have read that the risks of exposure from a broken condom is about 2 out of 2000, depending on whether one knows if the given partner was positive. So, if the difference in protection and non-protection is a latex barrier between body fluids, is there a risk difference between a broken condom and limited (under 60 second) non-protected exposure?

2) I have read that menstruation does not hinder the efficiency of condoms, but in a case of a broken condom can it increase the level of risk for either or both partners?

3. I have heard that HIV may be transmitted through relations with individuals who have been exposed to the virus within the last 7 years. How does this work, and is there any actual legitimacy to it?

Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions.

Response from Dr. Frascino


Thanks for your kind comments.

1. Actually your 2-in-2,000 statistic isn't accurate, because it depends on which anatomical site ("tab A and slot B") we are talking about (oral, vaginal, anal). There is no statistical difference between 60 seconds of unprotected broken-condom sex and 60 seconds of unprotected commando sex.

2. Yep, primarily for the insertive partner ("tab A"), if the menstruating partner is HIV positive.

3. Nope. No legitimacy whatsoever. If someone is HIV positive, he is contagious no matter how long he has been virally enhanced.

You're welcome!

Dr. Bob

Help Me Please...No Doctors have had any luck.
bob ill donate you...pls answer my question ....i plead u

  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS



This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.

Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.

Powered by ExpertViewpoint