Why don't you support more frequent testing?
May 7, 2005
You hear this often, but you are truly an inspiration and a kind soul. I wish only the best for you and yours.
Ok now thats out of the way - to the meat - I question why you don't suggest that people get tested more often - and with smaller time between tests? There is evidence beginning to pile up that testing during seroconversion can greatly impact a person's ability to fight the HIV virus over the course of his or her (hopefully long) life. This may be an effective method to add years to that life.
So often I see (from all experts not singling you out) that testing at 3 months is the answer.
My situation - I had a virtually no or low risk exposure. I won't get into it further - it involved a pro hand and lots of irrational fears on my part.
My plan is to get tested at 25 days, 4 6 8 and 12 weeks.
I realize that the odds of me contracting something are small - but it is important for some people to realize - that it is possible that by treating your infection before it is in the 'chronic' stage a la post seroconversion - you have a chance to keep a larger portion of your immune system healthy, thereby potentially increasing the years in your life and the life in your years.
I realize that it can be inconvenient to test frequently - but hopefully putting yourself at risk isnt an every weekend type of thing for most of us and we can make special considerations for this one time.
Even if the odds of infection are low 1 out of 10,000 or choose your own tiny fraction - if you choose different words it becomes poignant for me.
By saying, by taking a simple test you have a 1/10k chance to make your life 10 - 20 - 40 who knows how much percent longer/healthier/better - wouldn't you do it?
I hope that this found its way to you, and perhaps we can discuss some way I can offer some assistance or volunteer hours to your service. I am a college educated, young exec - whatever that means.
Regards, joe in boston
Response from Dr. Frascino
Hello Boston Joe,
The reason that I and "all the experts" do not recommend more frequent HIV testing with shorter time intervals is that there is no scientific rational or justification to do so. There is no firm scientific evidence that I'm aware of that indicates "testing during seroconversion can greatly impact a person's ability to fight the HIV virus . . ." or that it may be "an effective method to add years to that life."
I'll tell you something else "all the experts" would also agree on. If you've had "virtually no exposure" (i.e. a hand job and lots of irrational fears), there is no reason for HIV testing! Your plan to get tested at 25 days and at 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks is irrational and extremely expensive. The money wasted on such testing could actually save lives or be used to test people who are actually at risk. Since you are "college educated," think it over!
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Can I Take Ambien With Atripla?
- How Can Men Catch Hiv From Women?
- How To Naturally Reverse Neuropathy?
- Is Streptococcal Infection Of Throat Common For Hiv Positive?
- Clinics That Provide Ivf Fertilization For Hiv Positive Females
- How Long Do Symptoms Of Aids Take To Show Up After Initial Infection?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.