 | ||
   | ||
Email
Glossary |
|
Highly unlikely + highly unlikely Mar 27, 2001 Suppose you have had a risk that is been said to be a highly unlikely way of infection and an elisa negative test at 3 months after that risk that like all people say, its highly unlike to then test positive after that, is this person on the clear with this two highly unlikely circunstances added? What do you think? |
||||||||
 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
 |
| Response from Mr. Kull
 My response is simple: since you are never going to be one hundred percent sure about anything in life, highly unlikely is the best you are going to get. RMK | ||||||||
 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Q&A TERMS OF USE
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.
Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.
