meds impacting transmission statistics?
Jun 12, 2004
"The risk for HIV transmission per episode of receptive penile-anal sexual exposure with an HIV-positive partner is estimated at 0.1% to 3%."
Would this risk be higher if HAART was never developed?
Is HIV in the third world more easily transmitted due to a higher average viral load, since most of the infected are not on HAART?
Response from Dr. Frascino
Let me give your some data from a very recent study from UCSF (University of California, San Francisco), my alma mater. A 2004 study of young gay men spanning the advent of HAART (1994 to 1999) concluded that meds reduce HIV transmission by 60%. That's the good news! The bad news from the same UCSF HAART study showed that these young guys engaged in twice as much unprotected anal sex, causing the HIV infection rate to plateau instead of plunge. I'll let you draw you own conclusions from that data.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- HIV Risk Of Vaginal Sex Without Condom
- Probability Of Getting HIV From Cut On Hand
- Unprotected Anal Sex Without Ejaculation Risk Of Getting AIDS
- Is Chest Cold A Symptom Of HIV?
- Is Tingling In Feet A Symptom Of Acute HIV Infection?
- Blood In Urine After Receptive Anal Sex With Condom Does It Mean I Have HIV
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.