 | ||
   | ||
Email
Glossary |
|
Polyurethane or Latex? Jun 1, 2004 Dr. I think I had a high risk encounter in early October of last year. I used a condom but today noticed that it read polyurethane on it and that it might not be effective against all STD's. They print that this is being evaluated! Who the heck knew that there was any other type rather than latex and sheepskin? What the HECK?! I had multiple negative tests since then including a negative ELISA on May 10th, almost 7 months after. Am I then considered ok? Also, why the heck do they use polyurethane if it might not be effective? Or am I just blowing this out of proportion? Needing help, Mike |
||||||||
 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
 |
| Response from Dr. Frascino
 Hi Mike, Polyurethane condoms have been thoroughly evaluated for protection against HIV transmission. They are indeed very effective. They are particularly useful for folks who are allergic to latex. Latex allergy can vary in severity form mildly annoying to life threatening (like an allergic bee sting reaction). The condoms that are not protective against HIV are the lambskin variety. Yes, your seven-month tests are definitive. WOO-HOO! Stay well, Mike. Dr. Bob | ||||||||
 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Q&A TERMS OF USE
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.
Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.
