 | ||
   | ||
Email
Glossary |
|
PEP in acute infection Sep 18, 2003 Hello, First off, I would like to say what a great forum this is to people who are infected, and who are worried well! My quesion, is related to PEP. In your opinion, when is this therapy considered not to be effective. For example, an exposure that occured a month ago, would this person be a candidate for PEP therapy? Your reply would be gratly appriciated!!!!!!!!!! Worried well (hopefully!) |
||||||||
 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
 |
| Response from Dr. Frascino
 Hi, Thanks, I'm glad you find the forum informative. No one knows the exact answer to your question; however, a month is definitely way too long. PEP (post-exposure prophylaxis) is given to try to prevent infection. Current studies and guidelines indicate it should be started as soon as possible after a significant potential exposure, such as unprotected receptive vaginal or anal sex with a confirmed HIV-positive partner, and no later than 72 hours, to have the best chance of preventing viral transmission. Dr. Bob | ||||||||
 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Q&A TERMS OF USE
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.
Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.
