Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
   
Ask the Experts About

Safe Sex and HIV PreventionSafe Sex and HIV Prevention
           
Rollover images to visit our other forums!
Recent AnswersAsk a Question
  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary


Old studies that are worth a look
Jan 18, 2003

Dr. Ryan, I was searching for more information related to transmission by oral sex and I found 2 studies that kinda contradict mostly everything I constantly read. The studies are "109. Spitzer PG, Weiner NJ. Transmission of HIV infection from a woman to a man by oral sex [letter]. New Engl J Med 1989;320:251." and "110. Quarto M, Germinario C, Troiano T et al. HIV transmission by fellatio [letter]. Eur J Epidemiol 1990;6:339-340.". Both of them have reported cases of infection through insertive oral sex. Im all confused and desperate again. I beg you to comment on those studies... are they reliable? why doesnt anyone talk about them and say that there are no reported cases? I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Response from Mr. Kull

If you really look hard for the exceptions to the rule, you'll probably find them. However, the two cases you cite are probably NOT the exception to the rule, and there is still no confirmed, reliable data that supports transmission to the insertive partner in oral sex.

The available information regarding oral sex overwhelmingly agrees that risks associated with insertive oral sex are negligible.

The evidence of transmission through insertive oral intercourse in the two cases you cite have not been confirmed. This means that the findings are primarily anecdotal, and that they are not conclusive. It is possible that transmission occurred through other routes (like receptive cunnilingus) and that infection did not occur in the route described.

Please, be careful with what you read. While you might find one case that suggests the exception, that does not mean that the finding was accurate or is applicable to the majority.

RMK



Previous
Herpes
Next
blood contact?

  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS


 
Advertisement



Q&A TERMS OF USE

This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.

Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.

Powered by ExpertViewpoint

Advertisement