Does undetectable virual load mean no need for condom?
Dec 19, 2000
If someone is given treatment to the point that the virus cannot be detected, does this mean it is safe to have intercourse without a condom?
Response from Mr. Kull
No one is sure yet. There has been research that suggests an undetectable viral load in blood does not correlate with levels of virus in semen. Some theories suggest that HIV compartmentalizes, meaning that it replicates in specific areas of the body and may remain unaffected by certain antiviral treatments. So you could have an undetectable viral load in your blood but still have high enough levels of virus in semen to infect another person. On the other hand, recent studies in Africa have shown that having a very low or undetectable viral load in blood significantly decreases the odds of infecting a sexual partner. So the answer to your question is unclear at the moment and condom use is still recommended regardless of viral load.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- HIV Infection Risk Needle Stick
- Unprotected Sex Without Ejaculation And HIV Transmission Risk
- Is Sore On Penis A Sign Of Acute HIV Infection?
- Is Tingling In Fingers An Early Sign Of HIV?
- Probability Of Getting AIDS From Sex With A Prostitute
- Rash After Licking Genital Worried I Have HIV
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.