Jan 21, 2002
I was recently diagnosed with what my family physician thought to be a primary herpes outbreak. However, not only did the test come back negative, but there was none of the characteristic symptoms (blistering, ulcerated sores, etc.) and the bumps were gone without incident within a few days. Is there anything that herpes is known to be confused/misdiagnosed with?
| Response from Mr. Kull
It is important to discuss medical issues directly with your doctor. Testing for herpes isn't foolproof, so it may be wise to not rule out a primary herpes outbreak at this point. Blood tests for HSV-2 infection are highly accurate, yet do not have the ability to predict the future course of symptoms. Cultures of fluid taken from sores can produce false negative results, which is why clinical examinations are important.
Common sexually transmitted infections that are characterized by genital lesions are genital herpes, syphilis, and chancroid. Talk with your doctor about your next steps, how to rule out other infections, and how you should proceed if you experience similar symptoms in the future.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.