first vs. third
Feb 14, 2002
Any diffference between taking a 1st and 3rd generation Elisa at greater then 6 months?
Response from Mr. Kull
A 1st generation ELISA is likely to be as accurate six months after exposure when compared to 3rd generation ELISA. However, there are some important differences. Early generation assays will detect antibodies to HIV in about 6 to 12 weeks following exposure; newer generation (3rd and 4th) can detect antibodies as early as three to four weeks. Also, newer generation tests are fine tuned to detect antibodies to all known subtypes of HIV. This is not as important for someone whose exposure is limited to the U.S., since subtypes that are commonly found in the U.S. would be detected by 1st generaiton.
Clearly, being antibody tested with newer generation assays is more desirable, and it is unlikely that you would be tested with 1st generation assays in the U.S, unless you use the Home Access testing system.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- HIV Transmission Vaginal Secretions
- Odds Of Contracting HIV Sharing A Toothbrush
- Odds Of Getting HIV Insertive Anal Sex
- Should I Get Tested After Unprotected Oral Sex Without Ejaculation?
- Flu Symptoms After Getting A Tattoo Worried I Have HIV
- Hpv After Swallowing Sperm Worried I Have HIV
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.