doubt hiv exposures
Nov 25, 2012
hi doctor i want to know why in laboratory setting an exposure to a small quantities of concentrated virus to intact skin is consider a risk but in hospital setting or housesettings exposures to small amounts of infectious fluids to intact skin its not consider a risk at all. my doubt its that because i read a bounch of articles in the cdc mmwr and one conclude these "One worker's infection was presumed to be caused by "undetected skin contact with virus culture supernatant" why in lab is considered and in house or hospital settings not. Weiss SH, Goedert JJ, Gartner S, et al. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection among laboratory workers. Science 1988;239:68-71.
Response from Dr. Young
Hi and thanks for posting.
I'm not sure exactly what your question is; exposure of infected body fluids to intact skin is not considered a risky exposure.
Perhaps you shouldn't use a 24 year old document as the most up-to-date. Here's the 2011 CDC review of HIV transmission in the occupational setting.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Hiv Symptoms Timeline
- If I Have High White Blood Cell Count Does That Mean I Have Hiv?
- What Percent Chance Of Getting Hiv If Stuck With A Contaminated Needle?
- Can You Get Hiv From Fingering A Female?
- Hiv Transmission Mucous Membranes
- What Does It Mean If You Hiv Test Comes Back Nonreactive?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.