|
| ||
| oraquick advance oral mucosal transudate Jun 10, 2012 hello doctor.one time the doctor robert j frascino said me that the oraquick advance that uses the oral mucosal transudate doesn't gives "false negative" result,but can gives, (sometime),only "false positive" result,when instead a person is not infected by the aids.especially when there is a normal line next the c letter and a very faint line next the t letter.so every negative result is a "true negative" result.i hope you can confirm this fact,because i have done 3 oraquick advance test using my oral mucosal transudate,at one year from the sexual exposure,and they all result "negative".in this way i am sure that i can stay in peace of mind regarding the aids.thank you for your kindly reply. god bless you. seanconneryp@libero.it |
||||||||||
|
|
Response from Dr. McGowan
Dear Sean, Yes, Dr Frascino was correct. The Oraquick Advance test may produce a "false positive" test on occasion, but "false negative" tests would be very rare. As long as the test is run properly and the line next to the C (for "control")is there, the results of a negative test are extremely reliable. Especially since you have had 3 negative tests, that multiplies the likelihood that the test is truly negative. Best, Joe | |||||||||
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
|
||||||||||
Q&A TERMS OF USE
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.
Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.










