|Switching from Atripla to Complera
Apr 7, 2012
I have been taking the Atripla combo for the past 4.5 years with great success. I immediately became undetectable from a viral load of 171000 and my cd4% has risen from 10.5 to 35%. I currently take the 3 parts of Atriple because the country I live in does not yet have the single Atripla or even Emtriva. In anticipation of Atripla coming here I've been buying the Emtriva abroad and paying full price for it. Now to my surprise I have learned that Complera not Atripla will become available here (and totally covered by insurance). Am I crazy to consider switching from the extremely successful Atripla combo to Complera in order to save $425 per month? If I did switch to Complera and had problems is it possible to switch back to Atripla without causing somekind of resistance. Would a switch to Complera somehow limit my future options? Thanks for your advice!
| Response from Dr. Young
Hello and thanks for posting.
A few thoughts:
First, if it will save you money, you might consider using generic lamivudine (Epivir) instead of emtricitabine (Emtriva). These two medications are roughly equivalent, and the former is now generic in many parts of the world, whereas the later isn't (and more expensive).
Second, yes you could consider migration to a Complera regimen, though understand that Complera has a different set of requirements for food and drug interactions than efavirenz (part of Atripla). There's less data on switching to Complera regimens, particularly in persons who (like you) start with high viral loads and low CD4s, but I work under the assumption that this is likely ok.
If for some reason you don't tolerate the Complera, you could switch back to the Atripla regimen, provided that the reason for switch wasn't viral resistance. In this later case, there's a much more involved set of considerations, including drug resistance testing that would have to be done.
In the end, one needs to weigh how much benefit having a 1 pill a day treatment is versus continuing a successful 3 pill per day regimen is to you. In my doctoring world, I see both sides of this argument; in my personal world, I don't necessarily think that the 2 pill difference alone warrants a change, but but if there are other issues, such as side effects or improving adherence, then these added potential benefits might offset the small risk in the change.
I hope that helps, BY
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Is Swollen Lymph Nodes A Sign Of Acute HIV Infection?
- Is Tingling Lips A Sign Of HIV?
- Bloody Urine After Anal Sex Without Condom Does It Mean I Have HIV
- Itchy Rash After Sex With Hooker Sign Of HIV AIDS
- Muscle Ache After Getting Fingered Sign Of HIV AIDS
- Sore Throat After Vaginal Sex With Condom Does It Mean I Have HIV
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.