Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
   
Ask the Experts About

Choosing Your MedsChoosing Your Meds
           
Rollover images to visit our other forums!
Recent AnswersAsk a Question
  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary


Just became detectable again
Dec 2, 2011

Hello Doc,

I've been on Atripla for 10 months,with 99% adherence. Started having Neuropathy since July this year CD4 was 55 on January this year and co infected with TB. TB meds stopped by the doctor on July.

Here is my records; -Jan :CD4 55, VL 500.000 -March : CD4 150,VL 400 -May : CD4 437 ( 18%), VL 90 -July : CD4 380 ( 18%), VL Undetectable (<40) -September ;CD4 400 ( 20%), VL Undetectable (<40) -November:CD4 280 ( 20%),VL 49 and Mild ALT elevation ( 42) My Doctor said about my viral load; 'It's Only a Blip' And He also said nothing to worry about my previous CD4 Count ( 280/20%) because the percentage remain the same with the result in September. My next appointment will be on February next year. Are you agree with him that "It's only a Blip'? and how about my CD4 count that dropped quiet significant from 400 to 280? I'm worried the HIV started to resistant with Atripla... And Also do you think wouldn't be too long for my next appointment in 3 months later due to my condition now? Please Advise,

Thank you so much,Doc...

Response from Dr. Young

Hello and thanks for posting.

A single viral load of 49 is usually of no great concern (other than causing apprehension and a chat with our online forum). I'd ask you if you had a missed a few doses of medications or (more likely) a cold or herpes outbreak or the like around the time of the lab tests- these usually account for the low level detectable VLs.

While a blip is formally defined by having a return to undetectable, we have ample evidence that such tests are typically not significant and the next tests return to undetectable levels.

If you were my patient, a three month follow up would be fine, but if questions persist, a VL test sooner wouldn't be unwarranted.

Hope that helps; and have a great holiday season. BY



Previous
FACIAL WASTING
Next
sexual

  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS


 
Advertisement



Q&A TERMS OF USE

This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.

Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.

Powered by ExpertViewpoint

Advertisement