Feb 16, 2009
The crteria for determinining an individual's HIV status using the Western Blot varies with respect to the location where the test is carried out. Could this have a bearing on false positives? Could it affect the statistics of HIV?AIDS occurence?
Response from Dr. McGowan
The western blot is almost always used as a confirmatory test after a positive enzyme linked immunoassay result. A western blot test should not be done in the absence of performing the enzyme linked immmunoassay. Your question, I believe, is making reference to the topic of HIV testing in low HIV prevalence areas/populations that can lead to "false positive" or "indeterminate" HIV test results. ("False negative" results have been most often reported during acute or recent HIV infection). In any event, repeat serologic HIV testing is almost always indicated in the first instance especially if the patient's viral load is below the level of detection. I should add that false positive HIV test results are extremely rare and, therefore, do not impact large scale reporting of HIV/AIDS statistics.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.