Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Read Now: TheBodyPRO.com Covers AIDS 2014
   
Ask the Experts About

Choosing Your MedsChoosing Your Meds
           
Rollover images to visit our other forums!
Recent AnswersAsk a Question
  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary


Bizarre Dutch case
May 30, 2007

Dear Dr. Young,

Dutch guy here again. Today there was shocking news in the Dutch media (I don't know if you've heard about it):

====

Two 48 yo men from the village of Slochteren and a 33yo man from Groningen are suspected to have sedated at least five men so that they could be sexually abused.

The suspects have declared that they have infected the men, also by injecting their own infected blood, for their own kick. Besides that they claim that unprotected sex is pure.

The Dutch HIV specialist and researcher prof. S. Danner has declared that he regards this as an act of murder. According to his opinion in most of the cases HIV leads to death. He claims that people think way too easy about treatment and medicines. As long as we don't know the long term effects of the meds and as long as people still are dying of aids (even though they have access to treatment) HIV still must be regarded as a deadly disease because on the long run these victims will die of it.

====

This professor Danner is a well respected hiv researcher in the Netherlands. But what he states seems contradictionary to your beliefs and this worries me a lot. How do you regard his words?

greet from Holland from Dutch guy

Response from Dr. Young

Hi DG,

Good to hear from you.

I've not heard of this case or Professor Danner's comments, but I'd agree that this is a very bizzare and aggregious act. I personally wouldn't categorize this as murder, but at the least attempted, premeditated murder. Untreated HIV is a deadly disease, the act(s) wouldn't need to account for the possibility of treatment to measure the seriousness of the act.

So, I don't find this contradictory at all- the deliberate passage of HIV should not be taken lightly. Without treatment, these infected individuals will very likely die of HIV complications. I differ in so much as "in the long run", if these infected persons have access to care and medications, that they need not die of their complications. This later difference has little to do with the legal case, as the Professor was discussing, but rather to do with the long-term prognosis of persons in care.

Hope this helps. BY



Previous
Atripla and uneven heart rate
Next
no question

  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary

 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS


 
Advertisement



Q&A TERMS OF USE

This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.

Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.

Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.

Powered by ExpertViewpoint

Advertisement