Is valacyclovir standard prophylaxis?
Jun 2, 2006
I have been battling a very bad case of shingles on my face for the past two months. Immediately the day of the outbreak, my doctor put me on valacyclovir (Valtrex) 1000mg 4xdaily. I have been HIV+ since 1996, and have never had a herpes-related incident.
Recently I was talking with a colleague who has been HIV+ a lot longer than I , and he was shocked that I had not been taking Valtrex from the very day I was diagnosed positive. He says it is standard procedure, a standard part of every HAART regime. I have, and have had good HIV savy physicians, and I had never heard this. Is he right? Should I be concerned, or even angry that I wasn't taking anti-herpes medication all this time as a prophylaxis?
Concerned in NYC
Response from Dr. Wohl
Your friend is not correct. Valacyclovir is not routinely prescribed to HIV+ persons without a history of recurrent herpes outbreaks. I reserve use of this medication as a prophylaxis to those who have outbreaks every month or two.
Shingles lesions should respond well to valacyclovir and should not last 2 months. I wonder why you still have lesions. Were they located only on one side of your face - as is typical? Could they be super-infected with bacteria? The bubbles that you had initially really should be gone if this is shingles.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.