re: Challanging the ol' Davester
May 28, 2005
The article I pointed you to discusses the Options Project out of San Francisco. Haven't you heard of that study? It showed that close to 10% of newly infected gay men in the area were most likely infected via receptive oral sex. Yes, the study is nearly 10 years old. But so what? Has any new evidence come to light that refutes those older findings? Why in the world would we turn a blind eye to that study when it helped shed some light on such a major topic?
Response from Dr. Wohl
I don't think we actually disagree. Oral sex carries risks and there are factors that likely increase the risk (ejaculation, viral load, susceptibility to HIV infection etc). I just don't think the risk is high.
There are several studies that support my position including a nice one done in Spain a few years ago among hetersexual discordant couples. I am in an airport in China so my ability to access the article is limited. For a nice review read: http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu/InSite?page=pr-rr-05
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.