May 3, 2004
Your recent response regarding an Austrailan Vaccine question confused me. The website says that the people on the experimental drug were able to lower their VL by "6 times" vs. the placebo group. Why is that statistically insignificant. I would love to lower my VL by 6 times with no side effects or toxic complications. What am I missing.
| Response from Dr. Pierone
The Australian vaccine study presented at the recent Retrovirus meeting was a small study that looked at a therapeutic vaccine approach with a fowlpox vector. There was no difference in vaccine recipients (versus placebo) in immune response against HIV (red flag here). A one log (10 fold) reduction in viral load would be considered very good for an antiretroviral or immune based treatment. A 6 fold reduction would be fine as well, but because of the small numbers of patients in the study, the authors could not be sure the reduction in viral load was not due to chance (viral loads tend to fluctuate quite a bit). Further studies are planned to see if this vaccine if a keeper.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Risk Of HIV Transmission From Receiving Oral Sex
- Risks Of Contracting HIV From Licking Anus
- Should I Get Tested After Unprotected Anal Sex Without Ejaculation?
- Could Ear Infection Be A Sign Of Primary HIV Infection
- Headache Could I Have Acute HIV Infection
- Is Burning Penis A Sign Of AIDS?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.