|No replacements for ritonavir in the works?
Mar 24, 2004
Hello, wonderful doctor people! I've been following the scandal/hubbub over ritonavir since the price increase happened last December, and noticed that a lot of the complaints of docs like you and activists stem from the fact that ritonavir is the only drug out there that can be used to "boost" the effect of other drugs in a regimen.
If that's the case, then why aren't researchers and companies that are competing with ritonavir making new drugs that can replace ritonavir as a "booster"? Wouldn't these drugs be theoretically easier to make than other drugs, since all they'd need to do is make existing drugs work better?
Response from Dr. Wohl
The ritonvir price increase just happened. Even imagining that there is a ritonavir-like drug on some pharmaceutical company shelf somewhere, the company would need to embark on a series of clinicial studies to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this agent. Then comes the filing for approval followed by manufacturing and marketing. As you can also imagine, this would take time.
Th shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line. Point A is where we are now and point B is where we want ritonavir to be priced. We need to move to get the drug priced in a way that eliminates the hardships the increase has burdened many of our patients with. We can't wait for a new drug to come over the hill.
A good combination?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.