Feb 3, 2004
I've been reading lately about the benefits of clinical trials. I am treatment naive with a VL of 15,000 and TC 650 diagnosed in 11/02, neg in 6/01. Should I participate in one of these trials even though my numbers indicate I probably shouldn't start treatment yet? Would the clinical trial be better then what's currently out there? I know it's important to get the first treatment right, so how do I know the clinical trial is the best choice for me if I do participate? I also read that in some of these trials, you get a placebo, isn't that bad if I need to be on treatment?
| Response from Dr. Young
Thanks for your question and interest in clinical trials.
That said, persons who enroll in clinical trials tend to have much better drug performance and fewer side effects than those who don't-- I think that this is not because of better drugs, per se, but rather better attention to adherence and care.
All current clinical trials that include placebo, do so mostly to confuse the investigators and doctors as to which medications that the study subjects are taking, not to permit anyone to receive suboptimal treatments. Another way of saying this is that a typical study might look at two different 3-drug regimens, but include a 4th pill- placebo; all patients will receive 3 active drugs and a single placebo.
I hope this helps, BY
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.