Sep 24, 2003
1 It's usual to see only a rash during phi without fever or any other symptom?
2 If so, it means that the infected naive will be more sensible to develop rashes during the treatments for hiv (ex if he starts or switch a treatment)?
Response from Dr. Pierone
It is very unusual to see only a rash during primary HIV infection. The presence of a rash during primary HIV infection would not suggest to me that rashes would be more likely in the future. In two of the largest studies done of people with acute HIV infection the rate of rash was 56 and 69% (There were many other symptoms as well, 11 different symptoms on average). These studies did not look at subsequent risk of rash. If you have had an exposure you should be tested in any case because some people have minimal symptoms with primary HIV infection. Good luck. GP
Naive to Treatment
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.