|OK I do see it
Sep 6, 2003
Hi Dr. Young,
I failed to take into consideration the array of sophisticated tests to monitor liver functions. The statistic you quoted, 5 seems well established. I wonder if the bulk of liver damage form HAART is reversable. My professor seems to believe most is, it is a resilient organ to say the least. Well, from what I did to it my freshman year of college, I think the fact it is still working now attests to this fact.
| Response from Dr. Young
yes, the bulk (but not necessarily in every single case) of liver toxicity is reversible if detected early and managed correctly. You're also correct in the statement about the resiliency of the liver-- indeed, you can actually remove about 1/3 of the organ without significant functional compromise (as is done for living-related donor liver transplants). BY
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- What Is The Difference Between Gonorrhea And Hiv?
- High Levels Of Cytomegalovirus Antibody
- What Percentage Of People Are Hiv Negative After 6 Weeks?
- Is There No Risk Of Getting Hiv Through Fellatio?
- Can You Get Hiv On The First Time You Have Sex With An Infected Person?
- Is There A Relation Between Homosexuality And Hiv?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.