May 23, 2003
Dr., I can see the advantages of starting treatment in the acute stage in terms of salvaging a great portion of the immune system, but do you think this outweighs the likely risk of drug resistance down the road? Do you count on new drugs being approved when you issue meds to patients early in their illness? Thank you.
| Response from Dr. Wohl
This is really a question that gets to the heart of our current debate regarding the timing of HIV therapy initiation - the trade off between the beneficial effects of viral suppression versus the cost of drug resistance and toxicity.
The calculus has led to an (temporary) answer that later is better in most cases. A major exception has been the application of treatment to those with acute HIV infection. In this case it is not just a matter of rebuilding the immune system but preserving it from the initial onslaught of HIV infection.
The long term benefits/risks of early treatment, its ideal duration, optimal regimen(s) and dosing all need to be worked out and are the focus of much research. The answers trickle out, however, due to the difficulty of identifying such acutely infected persons. Stay tuned. DW
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.